This resonates completely. The first part generated obvious questions and counters that your second part addressed and answered beautifully!
It's always seemed to me that men are mushrooms and women are mycelium, both parts of a healthy organism. Although men may be in positions of control it has always been women who have the power. The world has been far too masculine for far too long and I welcome the transition to the feminine.
A woman producing babies is placing a burden on society. Pregnant women are generally not productive and neither are babies/ children. They require massive amounts of resources, time and effort to feed, clothe, protect and house.
This is traditionally man's role, to provide these things (along with his sperm of course).
The babies may end up offsetting this initial investment, by producing more value than was invested in them.... or they may continue to consume resources in later life, such as being on welfare or committing crimes and going to prison, or becoming politicians or heads of corporations which suck all the money out of the economy by force or fraud and hand it to a handful of industrialists, technocrats and 'philanthropists'.
Simply squeezing out babies is not automatically adding value to society.
This is precisely why women are suppressed! People suppress what they fear and people fear whatever has more power than them.
This resonates completely. The first part generated obvious questions and counters that your second part addressed and answered beautifully!
It's always seemed to me that men are mushrooms and women are mycelium, both parts of a healthy organism. Although men may be in positions of control it has always been women who have the power. The world has been far too masculine for far too long and I welcome the transition to the feminine.
A woman producing babies is placing a burden on society. Pregnant women are generally not productive and neither are babies/ children. They require massive amounts of resources, time and effort to feed, clothe, protect and house.
This is traditionally man's role, to provide these things (along with his sperm of course).
The babies may end up offsetting this initial investment, by producing more value than was invested in them.... or they may continue to consume resources in later life, such as being on welfare or committing crimes and going to prison, or becoming politicians or heads of corporations which suck all the money out of the economy by force or fraud and hand it to a handful of industrialists, technocrats and 'philanthropists'.
Simply squeezing out babies is not automatically adding value to society.
Your description of 2-D and 3-D intelligence is really cool and explains a heck of a lot thank you!